And now… The tipping point for me. The article that made me want to shake somebody at the Wall Street Journal. Did you know this summer is…
THE SEASON OF THE SUPERNATURAL!
Yep. “Real” authors are now coming out of the closet. The genre fiction my creative writing professor, Clint McCown, banned us from writing in his class because it wasn’t “real” or “literary” is suddenly okay. Except, wait! Let’s not call it horror fiction when literary writer Glen Duncan writes about a werewolf with “a lusty appetite for human flesh”. Nope- it’s “a high concept literary novel.” It just HAPPENS to have a man-eating werewolf as the narrator. Hmm… How can the literary establishment avoid the stigma of writing genre books? Certainly, those books, populated with werewolves, zombies, ghosts, and vampires, couldn’t possibly be horror fiction. Of course not. It’s “supernatural literary fiction”. I’d like to thank Glen Duncan’s publicist for taking the time to offer us here at MonsterLibrarian.com, a horror fiction review site, a review copy of The Last Werewolf.
The Wall Street Journal did briefly acknowledge the horror genre, but none of the books in this article were mentioned as part of the horror genre. And, while I understand that different imprints have different audiences, I was appalled at Knopf’s attitude that “we don’t do those kinds of books”. It’s so disrespectful to readers’ preferences, and readers are the lifeblood of any publishing house. The author of the Journal’s article tried to justify the popularity of these titles by counting Homer, Shakespeare, Dante and Milton as writers in the literary tradition who tossed gods, monsters, and the undead into the mix, but those guys cared about telling a story, not whether it was “literary”.
And that’s why my five year old is begging me to tell him about Odysseus and the Cyclops for the billionth time, and preparing for the zombie apocalypse (in spite of my attempts to protect him from all things zombie). The stories and the monsters are just that good. There’s no reason to be afraid of the H-word. There are a LOT of good storytellers out there. Even if they write “those books”, that’s no reason to write them off, or treat their readers with contempt.
Look, the horror community is not as organized as the romance community. RWA has hard data on sales and on who their readers are. Writers in the horror genre don’t. And it would be hard to collect… are there ANY major publishers who publish horror since Leisure went by the wayside? But horror readers, writers, and books are here, and it’s foolish for publishers, mainstream authors, and book critics to write them off. Horror fiction. Not “paranormal”, not “supernatural”, not, “thriller”, “science fiction”, “fantasy”, “dystopian” or “lowbrow”.(although it can be any of those things as well). It’s okay to read and write horror fiction with pride. No one should have to defend that choice.
No matter what anyone else doesn’t say.
Guest Interview: Jessica Meigs, Author of The Becoming « G.R. Yeates
June 30, 2011 at 2:57 pm
Gasp…The “H-Word” Appears in the Wall Street Journal! - Musings of the Monster Librarian
July 9, 2011 at 4:40 pm
Clint McCown
December 1, 2011 at 11:35 pm
The thing I try to steer my students away from isn’t writing genre fiction, but formula fiction. All genres have examples of high literary achievement. Formula fiction allows plot to dominate to the extent that characters become empty ciphers being run through the maze of plot points. That sort of connect-the-dot fiction evaporates quickly from the mind.
Kirsten
December 3, 2011 at 2:17 pm
Hi, Clint! Thanks for dropping by. I am not alone in remembering that you explicitly banned us from turning in genre fiction in your class. Any genre fiction. I’m glad your thinking and teaching has evolved in the almost 20 years since I took your creative writing class! I don’t have time now, but I’ll respond more fully later.