Home » Posts tagged "Teen Read Week" (Page 5)

Teen Read Week: It Came From The Library! Join the Conversation on YA Literature, Reading, and Libraries!

It’s Teen Read Week! Today, you (by which I mean everyone) can join the Twitter conversation on teen reading and young adult literature (pretty much anything remotely related to these topics is fair game– for more information click here), via the hashtag #TRW12. Or, if you don’t tweet, you can go here to share what you’re doing for Teen Read Week.

Teens can vote to choose next year’s Teen Read Week theme here.

And everyone can (and should) check out the Teens’ Top Ten list here, to find out who the winners are! Nominees included some fantastic and terrifying choices, including All Good Children by Catherine Austen, Ashes by Ilsa Bick, Across the Universe by Beth Revis, the creepy Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children by Ransom Riggs, and two Stoker nominees– A Monster Calls by Patrick Ness and This Dark Endeavor by Kenneth Oppel(Kenneth Oppel wrote an awesome guest post for us earlier this week– check it out! I really recommend you check out the entire list of nominees and not just the top ten, because many of the great books I mentioned above did not make the actual list, but every single one I listed is an AMAZING read.

Have a thrilling day!

Teen Read Week: It Came From the Library! Guest Post by Daniel Waters on Haunting the Library

Daniel Waters is the author of  the massively popular Generation Dead books.  He has just come out with a new book,  Break My Heart 1,000 Times from Hyperion.  Dan was kind enough to share a memory of a spooky event at his local library that he used in his new book for Teen Read Week.

Haunting the Library

by Daniel Waters

There is a little library in Connecticut that haunts me. The Raymond Library is located in Oakdale, the small town where I grew up (which has at least a passing resemblance to Generation Dead’s Oakvale) and is an odd looking building, half ancient brick, stylized and gabled; the other half industrial and featureless, a 1970’s addition attached like a prosthetic tail from the side of the older, more attractive building. The Raymond Library haunts me because it is a place that helped solidify my love of books and reading, and also because of the ghost I think I saw there.

I can remember dozens of the books that I checked out during the frequent trips my mother made there in my childhood. I checked out some of those books so many times I can still remember their locations on the shelves. Books on cartooning and dinosaurs, Dr. Seuss–my two favorites were If I Ran the Zoo and If I Ran the Circus, which I must have loved for their variety and invention, because I’d no desire to run anything, either then or now. I checked out the Thornton Burgess anthropomorphic animal tales by the armload, the Golden Press Doc Savage hardcovers, the big illustrated Alfred Hitchcock anthologies–Sinister Spies, Haunted Houseful, Ghostly Gallery. Also the Alfred Hitchcock and the Three Investigators series, which I preferred over The Hardy Boys series although I read dozens of those, too. At some point I drifted upstairs, where the “adult” books were, and found The Hobbit and then The Lord of the Rings, which I read with a companion reference to Tolkein’s works with all the place and character names; it had a wraparound Hildebrandt Brothers painting of the Fellowship heading off on their adventure. They had a spinner rack of paperbacks that you could take on the honor system; if you decided to keep one you were expected to leave one in return. I regularly fleeced the rack of science fiction and horror, replacing them with books from my parents’ stacks. I read through all the Ian Fleming James Bond novels (I still love series characters), and from there found Hemingway, Orwell, Salinger, Jackson and dozens of others.

I went to the Raymond Library until I entered high school, when other demands on my time–and my mother’s time, as she took a job late in my middle school career– kept me from visiting. I remember, or half-remember, the way I sometimes do when I get the sense that something subtly significant has happened when there is no overt signal of an event’s significance, that on my second to last visit I was looking through the nonfiction books upstairs and I noticed a sort of reading nook at the back of the library, set in front of one of the thicker old windows of the original building. As I remember it, there was a antique reading chair that sat on a small rug placed over the wooden floorboards and a small table. I had some time to kill, so I sat in the chair, and before opening my book, I looked out the window.

I saw a little blond boy, maybe five or six of age, standing outside in the grass. He was turned towards the road away from me and although I couldn’t see his face he seemed familiar. I thought it was odd that he was standing there, because there wasn’t really a play area at the library, and the entrance and parking lot was on the other side of the building. I opened my book, and when I looked up he was gone. Maybe I’d read a page, a paragraph or a single line, and real children are quick, almost as quick as ghosts, but at the time I thought the boy had vanished. It didn’t bother me, though. I started reading.

There’s a scene in Break My Heart 1,000 Times set in a library that’s similar in some respects to the Raymond Library. I detest spoilers, so I won’t go into what happens beyond telling you that one of the main characters encounters a ghost in the library there and his life is changed in a very subtle and profound way. That scene may be as close to autobiography as I get in my fiction.

A pipe burst in the Raymond Library a few years ago, and thousands of children’s books were lost. I happened to visit there in the final stages of the remediation; the nook I had remembered was walled off, the carpeting in the main area torn up and tossed in a dumpster at the edge of the parking lot. I went to the basement where the remaining children’s books were, and although the shelves were in disarray I could sense that many of my old friends, not visited for a couple decades, were among the casualties. I felt a profound sense of loss.

I think that I have seen more than a few ghosts in my lifetime, but I’m not certain that I believe in them. I definitely believe in hauntings, though. The little boy I saw? Maybe he was a ghost, in the classic supernatural sense. More likely he was a bratty kid who was testing the limits of his mother’s patience, one who finally complied with his mother’s wishes to “Get over here, right this instant!” in the exact moment I glanced at my page. Or–and this is the theory that I ascribe to–he was a projection of my own subconscious. That he was my ghost, both in the sense of being created by me and literally me, a me now gone. Was he–I–purposely standing with his/my back to me, his current older self? Or was it the library we were turned away from? Was there a reason he was facing the road? Wouldn’t it have made more sense if I’d spotted him/me at the top of the stairs leading to the children’s section?

These and a dozen similar questions spring to mind and the real answers will always remain just out of reach. Those questions and their lack of answers area part of the reason why I love ghost stories so much, and why I loved writing Break My Heart 1,000 Times. Ghost stories remind us of what has passed forever, and they remind us of what is to come. Such haunting reminders can be comforting or terrifying, and they sometimes they can be both simultaneously.

I’m glad that I saw the boy and I’m grateful for all of the associations and questions his sighting triggered; all was experience essential to my development as a writer. But I’m also very glad that the boy did not turn around, because who knows what I would have seen, staring into the spectral eye of my own ghost?

 

 

Teen Read Week: It Came From The Library! Kenneth Oppel on Frankenstein

Kenneth Oppel is the author of  two novels (so far) about the young Victor Frankenstein, This Dark Endeavor (reviewed here) and Such Wicked Intent(reviewed here). He has also written many other books, and received a Printz Honor Award for his novel Airborn in 2004. We asked him to share what influenced him to write the story of Victor Frankenstein. It was pretty neat to learn that Frankenstein is one of his favorite books! You can see what he wrote back to us below.

 

*************************************************************

 From Kenneth Oppel:

 

Frankenstein is one of my favourite novels, and I wish I’d written it. Unfortunately, it was written two hundred years ago by a 19-year old genius called Mary Shelley. Arguably, Frankenstein is the first science fiction novel, the first monster novel, the first horror novel. Not only is it an incredibly gripping read but, like all the best literature, it tackles weighty themes: reckless human ambition, the ethical implications of scientific pursuit, the creator’s responsibilities to his creations, and the perils of really, really bad parenting. All things that are still relevant today.

 

A couple of years ago, while re-reading the novel, I was struck by how quickly Victor Frankenstein’s youth is described – and one line in particular stuck out: “No youth could have passed more happily than mine.” Now, remember that this is a kid who goes on to dig up corpses, chop them up, sew the body parts back together, jolt them with electricity in the hopes of revivifying them, and creating life from death. Doesn’t sound like a very happy youth to me. What might have happened to Victor to lead him to become the “mad scientist” we all know? That, I thought, would make an interesting story.

 

A few pages later, Shelley goes on to give a helpful clue: “I entered with the greatest diligence into the search for… the elixir of life…. What glory would attend the discovery, if I could banish disease from the human frame, and render man invulnerable to any but a violent death!”

 

Right away I had an image of a teenager who was curious, ambitious, arrogant, and probably obsessive. Obsessions are a staple of literature — every great character has one. Whether it’s a desire or an aspiration, or the simple will to survive, there’s something that drives every hero — and every reader to keep turning pages.

 

Sixteen year old Victor Frankenstein is a fantastic character to work with. He’s the embryonic form of the man who will go on to dig up corpses, chop them up, suture then back together and jolt them with electricity to try to create life from death. Now that’s an obsession! When you read about people who create a work of genius, whether it’s an invention or a work of art, there’s often a strain of compulsion or even madness that motivates them and keeps them working tirelessly towards their goal — often at great emotional cost to themselves and those around them. Off the top of my head it could be as various as Howard Hughes (with his movies, or his Spruce Goose), or Francis Ford Coppola (Apocalypse Now) or Philip K Dick (who wrote himself to death).

 

Victor’s search for The Elixir of Life makes for an excellent quest. But it seemed to me there had to be something more behind it. What if Victor needed the elixir for a personal purpose? Was he himself ill? Or maybe a friend, parent – or a beloved sibling?

 

And so, in my alternative Frankenstein mythology, I decided that Victor Frankenstein had a twin brother, Konrad — who has an entirely different personality, and is a much steadier sort than Victor — and just that much better at everything.

 

It was tremendous fun to learn about the real Mary Shelley and her sources for Frankenstein. I’m sure plenty of my readers will pick up on all the references to the real Mary Shelley and the fascinating and tragedy-filled life she led. From my point of view, all this material was source material for me. I used Mary Shelley’s family as a basis for Victor’s – and stole characteristics from her husband (Percy Shelley) and friend Lord Byron to build Victor’s personality and backstory. When you’re reimagining a literary classic, you want to preserve the tone of the original, and this was one way I could do it.

 

And I loved writing Victor. As a writer I think you strive to create characters that exercsie the full range of human behaviour and emotion — and often these things are not heroic or noble or attractive. Victor is certainly a larger than life characters. He’s smart, arrogant, rash, selfish, but also loyal and loving and brave — in short, he’s no more an antihero than most of us on the planet. It’s huge fun to let loose a character with a temper, but also with a passion and a plan. I think you sympathize with Victor’s sense of inferiority around his perfect identical twin, and any reader would sympathize with someone who tries so hard to be good at things, in the shadow of another. Sometimes envy makes people do rotten things. So Victor’s not always nice, but you always want to watch him — and I think you want him to get what he wants, even if it’s a bit appalling. I mean, he’s Victor Frankenstein, not Harry Potter.