Home » Posts tagged "nonfiction" (Page 5)

Book Review: It Came From: …The Stories and Novels Behind Classic Horror, Fantasy, and Science Fiction Films by Jim Nemeth and Bob Madison

cover art from It Came From... by Jim Nemeth and Bob Madison

(  Bookshop.org )

It Came From:  …The Stories and Novels Behind Classic Horror, Fantasy and Science Fiction Films by Jim Nemeth and Bob Madison

Midnight Marquee Press, Inc., 2020

ISBN-13: 9781644300916

Available: Paperback

In this book, critics Jim Nemeth and Bob Madison explore genre films and the written works that inspired their creation,  Each is presented in its own section, chronologically, and the written works that inspired them. While this book primaritly covered fantasy and science fiction films, this review will concentrate on the aspects of  the horror genre presented. The authors include information on the production of the films, as well as the differences between the texts and the movies. At times they also posit the view that the film may be better than the books, a controversial opinion among some audiences.

The author of the horror section introduction argues that horror is the most difficult genre to adapt because movies “that merely provides a book’s ‘Boo!’ moments are but empty shells, lacking the underlying background and context that frequently makes the literary piece the more satisfying experience” (p. 12). He then moves to his example of The Shining. While I do not necessarily agree completely with the author, he does make some interesting points. Films included in the horror section include The Body Snatcher, Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Night of the Demon, Psycho, The Day of the Triffids, and Don’t Look Now.

Two titles receive special treatment in that they each have a significant chapter devoted to them: Dracula and Frankenstein. The authors look at “several of the best, worst, and most popular of their cinematic incarnations” (p. 11). Dracula films covered range from Nosferatu (1922) to Bram Stoker’s Dracula  (1992), while the Frankenstein films range from the first film version of Frankenstein (1910) to Victor Frankenstein (2015).

My primary criticism of the book is focused more on the overall contents rather than specific chapters. The authors interject their own opinions into the chapters in a way that can be a bit heavy handed. For instance, when it comes to science fiction, one of the authors makes it abundantly clear that he does not like the gritty, darker, current sci-fi storylines. Additionally, while it seems that each chapter is written by an individual author, it is difficult to tell who wrote which one.

This could be a good resource for anyone interested in exploring the literature upon which genre films are based, as long as readers are aware that the authors’  strongly expressed opinions are interspersed throughout.

Recommended with reservations.

 

Reviewed by Lizzy Walker

Book Review: Writing in the Dark by Tim Waggoner

cover art for Writing in the Dark by Tim Waggoner

Writing In The Dark by Tim Waggoner

Guide Dog Books, 2020

ISBN-13 : 978-1947879195

Available: Hardcover, paperback, Kindle edition  ( Bookshop.org  |  Amazon.com )

 

To properly review this book, I believe a writer needs to be at the helm. New writing manuals crop up so often, it’s tough to decipher which are worthy additions to your collection.  I challenge any aspiring or accomplished writer to walk away from this book unaffected and without substantial improvement in how they view the world and their own writing. For those unfamiliar with prolific novelist Tim Waggoner, who seems to come out with a new book every few months, either in his own worlds or in the franchises of Supernatural, Alien, or Grimm, he is also well-known as a professor.

Waggoner tackles his topic in a hybrid manner. First, he rolls through all the requisite topics, providing a history of the tropes and story elements and explaining how they are utilized in classic and popular fiction. Second, he poses the same two questions to a bevy of writers, some new, some iconic. Their responses, sprinkled in at  every chapter, punctuate what he has covered. The exercises at the end are pragmatic and work to specifically improve the reader/writer’s own work. That Waggoner is is a teacher is evident here, but the book is not stuffy or academic. After just a few pages, it’s clear that most writers would love his approach. I felt as if I were sitting in a dive bar, discussing secrets of the universe with my feet up. Waggoner can take the toughest topic– from theme, to voice, to motivation and conflict– and talk someone through it as if reviewing his favorite new movie.

Each chapter is broken down into specifics. My favorites include: “Why Horror Matters”, “The Physiology of Fear” (the connection between psychology and biology through the rush of reading horror is fascinating), and “The Horror Hero’s Journey”, a take-off of Joseph Campbell’s famous work.

After each topic, Waggoner gives the writer a specific exercise that stretches the imagination, followed by the pair of questions tackled by writers from all levels and areas of the genre: 1. What makes good horror/dark fantasy/suspense? 2. What’s the best advice you can give to a beginning writer of horror/dark fantasy/suspense?

It continues the conversation and keeps the book from being a lecture.

The most useful part of this book for me were the appendices. The psychological makeup and “pain” makeup questionnaires for your characters can help dive deeper, as well as allow readers to analyze favorite novels. It’s a brutal exercise, but yields great results.

I was in the final edits of a novel that I believed to be solid. Waggoner’s advice suggested I dig deeper. I did and now the story feels so much more alive and relevant than I had believed it to be. I was also completing the final chapters of a middle-grade novel, and felt the same way.

This is a fine workbook for writers of all stripes, levels, genres, and interests.

Let the professor work his magic on you.

Highly recommended, right up there with King’s  On Writing.

 

Reviewed by David Simms

 

Book Review: Blood Rush by Jan Verplaetse, translated by Andy Brown

cover for Blood Rush:The Dark History of a Vital Fluid by Jan Verplaetse  ( Bookshop.orgAmazon.com )

Blood Rush: The Dark History of a Vital Fluid by Jan Verplaetse, translated by Andy Brown

Reaktion Books, 2020

ISBN: 978-1-78914-196-2

Available: Hardcover, Kindle edition

 

The scariest of Halloween costumes usually involve blood spattered on clothing, dripping down faces, or leaking out of fatal wounds. Likewise, detailed written descriptions of bloody murders that really took place or seeing that blood flow in a horror film can easily inspire terror and revulsion. So, it makes perfect sense that Jan Verplaetse would want, as he says in the subtitle of Blood Rush, to write “The Dark History of a Vital Fluid.” However, Verplaetse‘s ends up offering odd tidbits of information only to leave the reader wondering where it will all lead.

The book begins with the usual descriptions of and explanations for pagan sacrifices and winds its way to Christian transubstantiation. Along the way, we are regaled with stories of Christians accused of cannibalism, Odysseus’ trip to Hades, and the belief that epileptics could be cured by drinking fresh blood, usually procured from executed criminals or gladiators. This ancient time period provides everything from the author’s thoughts on blood sausage and pudding to demonic blood drinking. The focus on bloodlust, something the author tells us he experienced, and blood vapor or mist as the essence of the life force establish the dark underpinning of human interest, even attraction to, blood.

In contrast, the rest of the book does not progress in a way that would suggest there has been a development or a series of changes in the way humans perceive blood, nor are the examples of people and events particularly interesting. Instead, Verplaetse jumps from religious relics, to toxic menstrual blood and public slaughterhouses. Suddenly, the book seems to be about violence and then blood sports and “barbaric masculinity.” Can people really smell blood? Verplaetse experiments with its impact on gamers and decides the answer is no. Are cows upset by blood? He decides they are actually upset by what they are experiencing not the blood itself. “Why do we derive pleasure from the horrific?” he queries after summarizing the plot of Stoker’s Dracula for us.

By the end of the book, the theme as stated in the title is lost. It seems as though the research led Verplaetse in other directions, yet he continued to move forward without showing how his new findings tied into his original thoughts. However, there is promise in other possible themes he mentions like “dark romanticism” or the impact of myth and superstition as they relate to blood. In this sense, Blood Rush does not fulfill its potential.

 

Reviewed by Nova Hadley