Home » Posts tagged "horror genre" (Page 10)

Musings: Shigeru Mizuki’s Yokai and Shoji Ohtomo’s Kaiju: Love Is In The Details

I attended G-Fest this past weekend with my son, who is a huge Godzilla and kaiju fan (for those of you who don’t know what kaiju are, they are giant Japanese movie monsters, most of which have been created since the original Godzilla movie premiered in 1954.  If you are a Gen Xer, you probably saw them on Saturday night and Sunday afternoon television).

While I’m not a huge Godzilla fan myself,  I have lived with two of them, and it’s an education. But their enthusiasm in collecting action figures and watching the movies is nothing compared to the contagious love of the genre and almost everything about it that I experienced at G-Fest. You have to dig deep to find the kind of information some of the people running the sessions shared.

 

Yokai daizaiku (electric yokai) anatomical drawing by Shigeru Mizuki

Yokai daizaiku (electric yokai) anatomical drawing by Shigeru Mizuki, courtesy of Monster Brains

The last session I attended was about art depicting Japanese monsters. One of the artists responsible for documenting Japanese monsters put incredible effort and artistry into depicting Japanese folk monsters, called yokai, particularly in the manga series Ge Ge No Kitaro. Eisner Award winner Shigeru Mizuki started out drawing pictures for Japanese story theaters called kamishibai, before the popularity of manga, studied and drew yokai from both the outside and inside (unfortunately, he died in 2015).

 

Drawing near the same time was another artist, Shoji Ohtomo. What Mizuki did for yokai, Ohtomo did for kaiju. His drawings show how interested he was in the details of what made kaiju work, and many people called him “Dr. Kaiju”. Unfortunately, while you can find a reasonable amount of information on Shigeru Mizuki, it’s not as easy to find the same

Cross-section of King Ghidorah (left), photo of Shoji Ohtomo,

Cross-section of King Ghidorah (left), photo of Shoji Ohtomo (right).

about Shoji Ohtomo. Here’s a short piece I found over at Monster Brains that includes several of his anatomical drawings. And a few of my very blurry photos from the session, run by Stan Hyde.

 

null

Anatomical drawings of Gappa (left) and Gamera (right) by Shoji Ohtomo.

 

You have to really care about monsters to want to imagine what they would be like inside if they weren’t fictional characters represented by an actor in a rubber suit.

Shoji Ohtomo is also credited by some with the original design of Ultraman, an alien kaiju fighter. Ohtomo’s original drawing appears on the right, with more finished designs on the left. Before I became a children’s librarian, I wanted to be an archivist and manuscripts librarian, and getting to see the details that go into the process of creation, whether it is drafts of a poem by Sylvia Plath or the development of a character like Ultraman is why I wanted to do that.

Original drawing and cross-sections for Ultraman, by Shoji Ohtomo

Original drawing and cross-sections for Ultraman, by Shoji Ohtomo

It’s easy to write off some of these films as cheesy B-movies. As a genre, they do indeed have their cheesy, goofy moments. But there are many talented artists in a variety of mediums who have contributed to the development of kaiju eiga films  and there is a lot more going on than there seems to be on the surface.  Because so much of what makes these movies work occurred (and occurs) in Japan, and (at least given my experience at this convention) many of the makers and actors aren’t known outside Japan(three of the special guests needed a translator), most people don’t get to appreciate that.

What does any of this have to do with the horror genre?  Well, if it had nothing to do with it, this would still be really cool to see. But besides stories about giant monsters being part of the stock in trade, many creators in the horror genre expend the same kind of attention to detail in crafting their art, and in the past have found their work similarly dismissed. I encourage you to explore the different ways monsters and horror are experienced around the world, so you can see that love of the genre expressed in the many different ways people perceive it. Look further, and find even more to love.

Book Review: Where Nightmares Come From: The Art of Storytelling in the Horror Genre (Dream Weaver #1) edited by Joe Mynhardt and Eugene Johnson

Where Nightmares Come From: The Art of Storytelling in the Horror Genre (Dream Weaver #1) edited by Joe Mynhardt and Eugene Johnson

Crystal Lake Publishing. 2017

ISBN-13: 978-1640074682

Available: Paperback, Kindle edition

 

With a few exceptions, books on writing usually bring on the snoozes, but Where Nightmares Come From is constructed in a manner that sidesteps the pitfalls of a typical writing book. It delivers both to amateur writers and seasoned authors, as well as giving readers an insight into how their favorite books came to be.

Twenty-eight chapters lurk between the covers, each by a different author (or several). Even if the reader doesn’t connect with one article or interview, there’s plenty more to capture his or her interest. The price of the book is covered in the first chapter, by Joe R. Lansdale, who talks about how the storyteller rules the roost, not the story. The conversational tone in which he spills his secrets brings to mind sitting across a table in a honky tonk, tossing back a few, and discussing the weather or sports, instead of the keys to a masterful story. “The Process of a Tale” is pure gold by Ramsey Campbell, a guru of the short story. Instead of telling how to write something in the abstract form, he shows the reader by taking them on a ride through drafts of an actual published story, dissecting each passage before improving it, piece by piece, tinkering with the language and design. It’s doubtful a struggling writer will close the book without feeling a kinship with the king of British horror. Charlaine Harris, author of the Southern Vampire Mysteries and Midnight, Texas takes readers on her own journey of storytelling, and how she concocts her novels. Like Lansdale, Harris knows how to explain her magic in a way that simply makes sense. Stephen King and Richard Chizmar share their experience collaborating on their recent bestselling book Gwendy’s Button Box. Elizabeth Massie, Ray Garton, and John Connolly also make great contributions, along with a slew of lesser-known authors readers should be aware of.  While I’ve mentioned just a few chapters in detail, every single entry has something crucial to offer the writer (or reader). This is a tool writers will be using for years. Highly recommended.

 

Reviewed by Dave Simms

Book Review: Why Horror Seduces by Mathias Clasen

Why Horror Seduces by Mathias Clasen

Oxford University Press, 2017

ISBN-13: 978-0190666514

Available: Hardcover, paperback, Kindle edition

I first came across Mathias Clasen’s article “Can’t Sleep: Clowns Will Eat Me: Telling Scary Stories on Academia.edu several years ago, and right then I thought “Here’s some original thinking– this is someone to watch” (I also liked that he wrote about literature– a lot of horror scholarship focuses on only movies). I was excited to discover that Clasen has now published a book that sums up much of his research, and takes it further. Clasen sees enjoyment of horror fiction as an evolutionary adaptation. Rather than using one of the traditional approaches of literary criticism, Clasen pursues a different one, the biocultural approach, which integrates evolutionary biology, neuroscience, psychology, and social sciences with literary study. He argues that to answer questions about why people seek out horror fiction and entertainment, researchers must have a “scientific understanding of how the mind works”, and therefore that an understanding of evolutionary history is necessary for an understanding of horror, which frames how a specific work is situated in a cultural context.

The first part of the book introduces the horror genre and academic approaches that have been and are used to analyze horror fiction in the past; then Clasen explains his own framework, and how he has applied his knowledge of evolutionary biology, neuroscience, and social sciences to explain why people react to fiction and engage with stories.  He narrows in from engagement with stories and fiction in general to a more specific focus on horror. Summed up, he believes that people seek out horror fiction because it’s engaging and because human beings are both naturally fearful and relatively vulnerable to the dangers of the world– so horror is a safe way to experience what we fear without putting ourselves in physical danger.

In the second section, Clasen provides a brief overview of 20th century American horror fiction and then engages in analysis of specific works, noting how each is rooted in cultural anxieties and fears from its time, but that looking at it from an evolutionary perspective can reveal why these works continue to resonate with today’s readers and audiences. His readings of these works ( the films Jaws, Night of the Living Dead, Halloween, and the Blair Witch Project; and the books Jaws, Rosemary’s Baby, I Am Legend, and The Shining)are examples of the kinds of analysis possible using his suggested biocultural approach, and they’re also really interesting to read. Learning about The Blair Witch Project’s transmedia success was pretty cool, but discovering that the directors actually left the actors in the woods for several days to get authentic reactions was disturbing. However, as interesting as I found these, I felt that it probably wasn’t necessary to have as many close readings as he did. Eight was more than enough.

The third section of the book contains Clasen’s theories on the future of horror. I find it interesting that, while he expects technology to make horror more and more immersive, and haunted house experiences to get scarier and scarier, that he thinks these experiences will appeal to mainly niche audiences, as the majority of horror lovers want to experience it vicariously, with distance between themselves and the horrific event. Horror fiction and cinema will continue to be the most popular forms of media for most people.

Finally, Clasen calls for further research on horror, including  a variety of research approaches that can stand up to scientific scrutiny and that cross disciplines, such as mining big data, case studies, observational studies, biofeedback and neuroimaging studies, experimental lab studies, and so on. I can’t imagine what it must be like to have a brain as crowded with ideas as his must be!

This is an academic book, and sometimes those can be dry, but that is not the case here. Clasen is clearly passionate and knowledgeable about his topic and his approach.  I’ve done research on reading engagement in the past, and there is definitely neuroscience involved in the process of learning to read independently. I feel like this biocultural approach to examining horror fiction and why people engage with it, is on the right track, and I encourage anyone who is interested in the topic to try this out (right now it’s relatively reasonably priced on Kindle) or at least to seek out his papers on Academia.edu.  Recommended.